 |
OT
Rob Petitti |
|
2003
Statistics
|
Coach:
Walter Harris
44-40,
7 years |
2003
Record: 8-5
|
|
KENT
STATE |
WON
43-3 |
BALL
STATE |
WON
42-21 |
at
Toledo |
LOST
31-35 |
at
Texas A&M |
WON
37-26 |
NOTRE
DAME |
LOST
14-20 |
at
Rutgers |
WON
42-32 |
SYRACUSE |
WON
34-14 |
at
Boston College |
WON
24-13 |
VIRGINIA
TECH |
WON
31-28 |
at
West Virginia |
LOST
31-52 |
at
Temple |
WON
30-16 |
MIAMI
FL |
LOST
14-28 |
CONTINENTAL
TIRE BOWL
|
Virginia |
LOST
16-23 |
|
2003 Final Rankings
AP-UR, Coaches-UR, BCS-UR
|
2004
Outlook
|
To
say the least, this is a transitional campaign.
The 'Golden Era' of Rob Rutherford and Larry
Fitzgerald is finished, with seriously deep
(if not total) changes across all offensive
dimensions. But this last phase of Pitt's
football history proved to be an exceptional
few years after nearly two decades of struggle
and disappointment. Harris saved the program
in his first year (1997) with Pitt's first
winning record and bowl game since 1983.
By turning around a program that won 15
games the five previous seasons, Harris
secured "savior" status for himself
that now translates into high expectation.
Two straight years now of finishing ranked
means such. Success would mean Walt Harris
is the coach that this steel city-college
needs, but we think the team is looking
to have struggles ahead in 2004.
When
a team can rely on the kind of readily-accessible
magic Fitzgerald held, young college players
often, as it was in Pitt's case, stop performing
themselves to watch and lean on such production
that consistently bails them out for wins.
The Panthers are now forced to fill in the
gaps this QB-WR combo leaves. They have
the talent to shape a new identity, but
saying this and achieving it are two different
things, huh. With expectations low and the
conference weakened, the bed is made for
Pitt to keep enough momentum going to make
this a winning season.
It's
funny that with such an offensive genius
at the helm, the main cornerstone becomes
the defensive back-seven. The main concern
is the offensive line and how its results
will affect an unestablished QB. Once the
other talent guys get the ball, points will
follow. But (even under Rutherford) there
has recently been a lack of the offensive
integrity and innovation for which Harris
is so famous. Since Pitt finished ranked
95th in the running department, we can only
wonder what hungry defenses have in store
for such a green QB-line combo. This will
not be a team that can come from behind,
so defensive stability/control will be the
primary key to any victory. If/when teams
can run against them, Pitt will wind up
on the losing end.
Expect
Nebraska to be their only guaranteed early
loss, but a hungry Connecticut has a bulls-eye
on Pitt that looks bad. The level of competition
is quickly increased with a Big East slate
that finishes Pitt's campaign. This is only
heightened by their second-to-last game
at Notre Dame, leading to a Thursday night
gig with backyard rival West Virginia. By
starting slow and finishing the year with
much tougher challenges, this young squad
is setting themselves up for a bad progression
of early overconfidence leading to sobering/deflating
realities. Learning first to win against
patsies (instead of first learning character
through close, but competitive, losses)
will not serve the team well. Just ask Virginia
Tech about what happens when you start too
easily. It looks bad, but just how bad will
go a long way toward making 2005 at Heinz
Field worth following. Just imagine, if
they could ever get a real college football
stadium to call their own
Projected
2004 record: 6-5
|
|
PITTSBURGH
*POWER RATINGS
|
Offense
|
Defense
|
QB
- 3 |
DL
- 2.5 |
RB
- 2 |
LB
- 3 |
WR
- 3 |
DB
- 3 |
OL
- 2 |
.. |
|
RETURNING
LEADERS
|
Passing:
Luke Getsy, 13-3-0, 32 yds., 0 TD
Rushing: Jawan Walker, 107 att.,
407 yds., 3 TD
Receiving: Princell Brockenbrough,
35 rec., 616 yds., 4 TD
Scoring: David Abdul, 9-18 FG, 49-51
PAT, 76 pts.
Punting: none
Kicking: David Abdul, 9-18 FG, 49-51
PAT, 76 pts.
Tackles: Brian Bennett, 118 tot.,
79 solo
Sacks: Brian Bennett, 3 sacks
Interceptions: Malcolm Postell, 2
for 66 yds.
Kickoff returns: Terrell Allen, 25
ret., 23.6 avg., 0 TD
Punt returns: H.B. Blades, 1 ret.,
9.0 avg., 0 TD
|
|
 |
LB
H.B. Blades |
|
|
|
OFFENSE
- 5
|
----RETURNING
STARTERS----
|
DEFENSE
- 7
|
|
KEY
LOSSES
|
OFFENSE:
Dan LaCarte-OG, Jon Schall-C/OG, Justin Belarski-C,
Matt Morgan-OT, Kris Wilson-TE, Rod Rutherford-QB,
Lousaka Polite-FB, Brandon Miree-TB, Larry
Fitzgerald-WR (NFL) |
DEFENSE:
Claude
Harriott-DE, Lewis Moore-MLB, Shawntae Spencer-CB,
William Ferguson-CB, Corey Humphries-FS, Andy
Lee-P |
|
|
2004
OFFENSE
|
Quarterback
This
is a unit that remains undefined until Panther
coaches can assess real-game developments. Luke
Getsy and fellow-junior Tyler Palko both have
shown reasons to make them the starter. Unfortunately,
both have also given reasons that the other is
more qualified. Getsy is more mobile, though not
considered a running QB by any stretch. Palko
has yet to reach the potential he showed when
recruited. Both the same size, Getsy has to work
on his "pocket presence" and decision
making. This position is truly up for grabs, and
the first guy to show he can play mistake-free
will, by default, start. Getsy is looking to be
the one as of now (post spring). If both struggle,
Joe Flacco (player favorite) is ready, just a
bit green.
Running
Back
Pitt
runs a traditional backfield, but the gaudy sizes
of their RB-FB combinations have opponent's work
cut out for them. Raymond Kirkley rode the pine
last year, but is now the #1 guy. Kirkley has
the speed a big man needs. Jawan Walker is ten
pounds smaller, but has yet to show he can consistently
get the Panthers more speed or power. Tim Murphy
is ready for the multiple carries and catches
a Pitt FB gets. He got quite a few in '03 as a
backup, so expect this position to be well-worked.
The real problem for Pitt is their lack of a 'slasher'.
Without a back who can make players miss (especially
on third-downs), the Panthers invite foes to stack
the box (run blitz) when needed. Expect more than
3.2 per run, though with mostly new backs and
only two returning linemen.
Receiver
Senior
Princell Brockenbrough will be the man to replace
Larry Fitzgerald as the Panther's main target.
Brockenbrough is big and proven as a deep threat.
He has seen double-teams already, so the focus
on him will not dampen his numbers. Greg Lee is
a sophomore who is another proven set of hands
that can also stretch the field. The only drop
off here is that this unit is young and unproven
once you get past these two guys. Inconsistent
mixes of size and speed dot the second- and third-strings,
but the potential is there. Keep that eye out
for Terrell Allen's development. This corp's growth
rate will reflect the results of the entire offense.
If they do well, everything will be clicking.
Those wondering what this crew will produce without
all-time great Fitzgerald should realize this
- without a superstar, and unless the entire depth
chart has been purged, most teams still thrive
as the wealth is spread and opponents are unsure
of where it will go from play to play.
Tight
End
Two
upperclassmen here flank the new line that itself
will feature two seniors who start for the first
time. This likely means that Pitt's usual TE-heavy
passing game will stay home early in the campaign.
Just like the WRs, when you see the Panthers throwing
to these ends four-to-six times per tilt, the
team itself will be progressing nicely.
Offensive
Line
With
so many struggling areas, why should this one
be any different? Many of the problems here are
a carry-over of the same dilemmas from 2003. The
hope here is that three of the starters are new,
and most anything will produce better results
than what the last group did. What can we say
when it's still the same left tackle here who
was on a line that allowed 43 sacks? We know LT
Rob Pettiti is talented, but the point still holds.
The promising part is the seniority (three out
of five are in their last season) in the second
team. Teams actually stacked the box once they
saw how easily this line was handled, which is
a curious stat for the nation's 14th-ranked passing
attack (that should have just beat teams over
the top WAY MORE OFTEN, especially with Fitz).
With new QBs, the predictable nature of knowing
whether a run or pass is coming may become easier,
so the pressure is on. Unless a strong "feature
back" can emerge, this line is likely to
fail even worse than in '03 (when they ranked
95th for ground production).
OFFENSIVE
BREAKDOWN
With
all of the different dimensions that Pitt can
clearly see were to blame for the team's disappointing
finish, the offense squarely shoulders a majority
of them. Panther fans cringed weekly as head coach
Walt Harris kept trying to run, something he cannot
do with teams knowing his heavy hand this way,
even when failing. This tact failed to keep teams
honest, but Fitz saved the day more often than
not. There is no magic safety valve now. Furthermore,
this means to look for teams to be that much more
effective if/when then know it is a "must"
passing down. New-QB Luke Getsy has to be rolled-out
early and often for this side of the ball not
to be a total disaster. Lateral movement will
nicely compliment the deep threats/routes at WR.
The real story will eventually be the line's inability
to hold its own once lateral ground options are
cut off. The pocket then starts to collapse quicker
and quicker with defenses able to (again) accurately
predict Pitt's play-choices. 2004 will be a continual
struggle for the Pittsburgh offense.
|
 |
QB
Luke Getsy
|
|
PITTSBURGH
2004 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters/Key
Players
|
OFFENSE
|
QB |
Tyler
Palko-Jr (6-2, 220) |
Luke
Getsy-Jr (6-2, 220) |
FB |
Tim
Murphy-Sr (5-10, 235) |
Mark
Yezovich-So (6-0, 220) |
TB |
Raymond
Kirkley-Sr (5-10, 225) |
Jawan
Walker-Jr (5-10, 215) |
WR |
Greg
Lee-So (6-2, 180) |
Joe
DelSardo-So (5-8, 200) |
WR |
Princell
Brockenbrough-Sr (6-3, 205) |
Joe
Stephens-Sr (6-0, 190) |
TE |
Erik
Gill-Sr (6-5, 265) |
Steve
Buches-Jr (6-3, 240) |
OT |
Rob
Petitti-Sr (6-6, 330) |
Kevin
Harris-Sr (6-5, 285) |
OG |
Charles
Spencer-Sr (6-5, 320) |
Rob
Frederick-Sr (6-3, 295) |
C |
Justin
Belarski-Sr (6-3, 285) |
Chris
Vangas-So (6-2, 300) |
OG |
John
Simonitis-Jr (6-3, 300) |
Eric
Fritz-Jr (6-3, 295) |
OT |
Mike
McGlynn-So (6-5, 320) |
Dale
Williams-Sr (6-5, 295) |
K |
J.B.
Gibboney-Sr (5-9, 175) |
David
Abdul-Jr (5-10, 185) |
|
|
2004
DEFENSE
|
Defensive
Line
This is an area of marginal concern. Senior rush
end Thomas Smith had 16 QBHs, but his bleak sack
total (two) shows how often he was either out
of position or just couldn't finish. We say out
of position (like the rest of the front-seven)
due to the 4.5 yards per run clip foes earned
last campaign. Beyond Smith, there are no guarantees
with these ends. Inversely, the middle starters
are marginally weaker, but the reserves are capable,
too, and will frequently rotate in for optimum
effect. This unit never gelled in ranking 87th
against the rush, and with three of the starting
four back, battle scars have to mean improvement.
Pittsburgh made the struggling Irish look good
as N.D. ran it down the Panthers' throats with
no resistance. Strong offensive lines will handle
these guys in a sixty-minute contest.
Linebacker
This is an area of real strength. The anomaly
here is how SLB (soph) Brian Bennett and WLB Malcolm
Postell (sr.), both reserves this time, combined
for nearly 40 more tackles in '03 than this year's
starting three did. That says much for the entire
corps and its rotational ability. First-time starter
in the middle Clint Session will be the newest
standout to reach his potential, and will bring
back a hard-hitting spirit to this unit. We foresee
the Panthers putting five on the line with such
a competent group here, but that will reopen up
the underneath passing routes. This crew is young,
but experienced enough to be the foundation of
anything successful (along with the safeties)
on this side of the pigskin.
Defensive Back
This unit is the hardest to predict for the 'D'.
The corners lack the focus it takes to permanently
handle these hot spots. But the potential for
Josh Lay (RCB) is unlimited with his size and
speed. Lay was chipped to a crisp at times, though
his spring performance showed he has taken the
proverbial
ahem
corner. The competition
for the other island also bodes well for the performance
level of the Panther DBs. The safeties, seniors
Morris and Gilliard, both play complete games,
but Morris is the better tackler. All this secondary
has to do is to keep the play in front of them
as long as they have these talented LBs with which
to align. They will beat last year's INT total
of 14, just watch.
DEFENSIVE
BREAKDOWN
The line has the most starters back, but we like
their back-seven better, regardless. Last time
around, Pittsburgh was a mediocre defensive squad,
shutting a few respectable teams down while allowing
much (and losing) to those they should have walloped.
The Panthers, under Paul Rhoads, went from 7th
in total defense in 2001 to 12th in '02, and then
dove to 79th in '03 (with seven returning starters).
What happened? Well, it was much of what we again
expect this time, which was/is a porous run-stopping
unit with an adequate coverage scheme. The line
has the chance to make things right, and they
have an eased slate of foes against which to do
such. A good TO-margin kept the time-of-possession
stats on their side, but without those, this campaign
will suffer. Look for Pitt to again "bend
but not break" as teams will move the ball
only to get checked most of the time once over
the 50. It's all there for the Panthers to turn
this side of the ball around, but doing it is
not guaranteed.
|
 |
LB
Brian Bennett
|
|
PITTSBURGH
2004 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters/Key
Players
|
DEFENSE
|
DE |
Azzie
Beagnyam-Jr (6-1, 245) |
Charles
Sallet-Jr (6-0, 225) |
NT |
Vince
Crochunis-Sr (6-4, 290) |
Jake
Holthaus-Sr (6-1, 285) |
DT |
Dan
Stephens-Sr (6-2, 295) |
Andy
Alleman-Jr (6-4, 281) |
DE |
Thomas
Smith-Sr (6-4, 275) |
Kyle
Smith-Fr (6-5, 240) |
SLB |
Brian
Bennett-Jr (6-0, 235) |
H.B.
Blades-So (5-11, 245) |
MLB |
Clint
Session-So (5-11, 230) |
Chris
McKillop-So (6-2, 230) |
WLB |
Malcolm
Postell-Sr (6-1, 235) |
J.J.
Horne-Sr (6-3, 225) |
CB |
Mike
Phillips-So (5-11, 180) |
Reggie
Carter-Jr (6-0, 190) |
CB |
Bernard
Lay-Jr (6-2, 195) |
Kennard
Cox-So (6-1, 180) |
SS |
Tyrone
Gilliard-Sr (5-11, 195) |
Sam
Bryant-Jr (6-0, 210) |
FS |
Tez
Morris-Sr (5-10, 190) |
Jemeel
Brady-So (6-0, 190) |
P |
Adam
Graessle-So (6-4, 205) |
J.B.
Gibboney-Sr (5-9, 175) |
|
|
|
2004
SPECIAL TEAMS
|
Kicker
Placekicker David Abdul has a leg, but his inabilities
ostensibly changed the course of three games. All three
became losses when Abdul missed critical attempts that
then changed the Panther's strategies, and therefore
the games' complexions. His attempts will again be the
difference in a few games, and his ability to convert
will additionally mean the difference between finishing
above or below .500.
Punter
Adam Graessle will make few fans miss the prolific Andy
Lee and his mastery of this skill. This second-team
all-Ohio replacement also has a knack at placekicking,
so his powerful leg could make itself in demand when
Abdul again struggles. He is their KO guy from '03.
Also important will be the snaps themselves, with both
long snappers now gone.
Return Game
Terrell Allen is the only guy who seems to be solid
in this area. A worthy KO-returner, there are likely
to be more development here than just Allen. It will
be the actual season before they decide on someone (who
can bring the speed and elusiveness needed).
|
|
|
|
|