 |
TE
Andy Roland |
|
2003
Statistics
|
Coach:
Ted Roof
2-3,
1 year |
2003
Record: 4-8
|
|
at
Virginia |
LOST
0-27 |
WEST.
CAROLINA |
WON
29-3 |
RICE |
WON
27-24 (OT) |
NORTHWESTERN |
LOST
10-28 |
FLORIDA
STATE |
LOST
7-56 |
at
Maryland |
LOST
20-33 |
WAKE
FOREST |
LOST
13-42 |
NC
STATE |
LOST
21-28 |
at
Tennessee |
LOST
6-23 |
GEORGIA
TECH |
WON
41-17 |
at
Clemson |
LOST
7-40 |
at
North Carolina |
WON
30-22 |
|
2003 Final Rankings
AP-UR, Coaches-UR, BCS-UR
|
2004
Outlook
|
Head
coach Ted Roof inserted life into Duke as
a fiery interim coach following the dismissal
of Carl Franks at the end of last season.
Roof led the team to victories over bowl-participant
Georgia Tech and rival North Carolina late
in the year, and has sparked interest in
a program that has been considered lifeless
and irrelevant. His passion transcends onto
the playing field, meaning Duke will play
with great intensity and desire every time.
He has the players believing in themselves,
believing in the system and believing/proving
they can win. That in itself is an accomplishment,
but it won't (necessarily) be enough to
increase the Blue Devils' 2003 win total
of four.
While
the defense should be marginally adequate,
and the offense has talent, overall inexperience
and a daunting schedule that features seven
bowl teams will likely prevent improvement
in the win-loss column. Early road games
at Connecticut and Navy are crucial. This
seemingly benign start could easily reflect
losses, but they need to be full of confidence
heading into their conference opener. Considering
Duke's current position, ironically but
predictably, Roof's job of molding this
cellar-dweller into a credible contender
will be a long and tedious process. He seems
motivated and he seems dedicated; looking
at recent history, that's probably a good
thing. You can see good individual moments
with the Blue Devils. Putting sixty minutes
of total effort into each tilt will pay
dividends by the time next off-season rolls
around. That means little, though, to anyone
with higher expectations. Basketball practice
is coming
Projected
2004 record: 2-9
|
|
DUKE
*POWER RATINGS
|
Offense
|
Defense
|
QB
- 2 |
DL
- 2.5 |
RB
- 2.5 |
LB
- 3 |
WR
- 2 |
DB
- 3.5 |
OL
- 2 |
.. |
|
RETURNING
LEADERS
|
Passing:
Mike Schneider, 208-97-6, 1220 yds., 4 TD
Rushing: Cedric Dargan, 69 att.,
264 yds., 5 TD
Receiving: Ben Patrick, 17 rec.,
218 yds., 1 TD
Scoring: Matt Brooks, 6-9 FG, 15-17
PAT, 33 pts.
Punting: Trey McDonald, 55 punts,
40.7 avg.
Kicking: Matt Brooks, 6-9 FG, 15-17
PAT, 33 pts.
Tackles: Brendan Dewan, 91 tot.,
47 solo
Sacks: Phillip Alexander, 6.5 sacks
Interceptions: Alex Green, John Talley
- 2 each
Kickoff returns: Senterrio Landrum,
25 ret., 28.4 avg. 0 TD
Punt returns: Jamin Pastore, 11 ret.,
5.9 avg., 0 TD
|
|
 |
DE
Phillip Alexander |
|
|
|
OFFENSE
- 4
|
----RETURNING
STARTERS----
|
DEFENSE
- 7
|
|
KEY
LOSSES
|
OFFENSE:
Drew Strojny-OT, Daryl Lewis-OG, Luke Bayer-C,
Rusty Wilson-OG, Reggie Love-WR, Chris Douglas-TB,
Alex Wade-FB, Khary Sharpe-WR, Adam Smith-QB
(transferred), Lance Johnson-WR (dismissed),
Brent Garber-K |
DEFENSE:
Matt
Zielinski-DT, Ryan Fowler-LB, Terrell Smith-S |
|
|
2004
OFFENSE
|
Quarterback
Returning starter Mike Schneider brings grit and
determination to the position, but also brings
inconsistency. He struggled as a freshman, but
is a good athlete, and is a threat to scramble
if flustered outside the pocket. Given proper
tutelage and progression, the sophomore could
be a solid player. If he falters, the Blue Devils
have other options. Senior Chris Dapolito has
the best pass efficiency rating of the returning
QBs. Appropriately named Nebraska-transfer Curt
Dukes is the x-factor. His passing skills aren't
polished, but Dukes is a fine athlete with playmaking
ability. Though an option-style quarterback, Dukes
could find his way onto the field on athleticism
and playmaking ability alone. A strong unit individually,
but the real test will be to see how and when
each is utilized, for that will define the offense
and Duke's amount of success.
Running
Back
With the departures, the backfield stands as a
major concern. Senior Cedric Dargan earns the
starting position by default, if anything. The
200-lb in-state product did manage 268 yards and
five scores last season, but his skills are somewhat
limited. In goaline situations, he is effective,
but Dargan fits the mold of a sound reserve back,
rather than a starter. Prep standout Aaron Fryer
is the most talented runner on the roster, and
is poised for a breakout sophomore season. Depth
exists, but this is another study in utilization,
not talent.
Receiver
Lance Johnson is a possession receiver, but lacks
breakaway speed and gamebreaking skills. He and
returning starter Senterrio Landrum, who has good
quickness, simply don't make many big plays. Landrum
showcases his talents in the return game rather
prominently, but has yet to find his niche at
wideout. Seldom-used Ronnie Elliot should have
an increased slot role. Physically speaking, incoming
freshman Chancellor Young is the most talented
Blue Devil option. The highly regarded recruit
chose Duke over UCLA, Notre Dame, Oregon and others,
and has pristine size and speed for the position.
While the returning receivers are somewhat restricted
as far as production goes, the tight ends are
anything but. Senior Andy Roland is one of the
ACC's most dynamic at his position. He caught
at least one pass in every game and has reliable
hands. That said, he may not be the Blue Devils'
most talented tight end. Junior Ben Patrick is
the best athlete on the team, and, at 260lbs,
he is a force to be reckon with in both the passing
and rushing game. He has NFL talent and should
have a banner year. In Duke's two-tight end offensive
set, both players will get a proper amount of
touches.
Offensive
Line
Without question, the offensive line was the most
pressing issue facing the team this off-season.
Right tackle Christian Mitchell is the only returning
starter, meaning the majority of the front line
is significantly raw. Fortunately, left tackle
Jim Moravchik does have some starting experience
to his credit and should team with Mitchell to
create a formidable bookend tandem, but the interior
of the line is untested. The guards are much worse,
with little promise for an inside running.
OFFENSIVE
BREAKDOWN
On paper, things look rough. An unproven quarterback
and a questionable backfield playing behind an
offensive line with four new starters don't prompt
much optimism. First-year offensive coordinator
Marty Galbraith comes with a solid resume, and
will likely take advantage of the Blue Devils'
strength at tight end and use plenty of two- and
often three-tight end sets to present favorable
matchups in the passing game and promote and efficient
rushing attack. Duke looks to again be methodical
and steady (33+-minutes per game time of possession),
and they have proven that "slow and steady
[often] wins the race."
|
 |
OT
Christian Mitchell
|
|
DUKE
2004 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters in bold
|
OFFENSE
|
QB |
Mike
Schneider-So (6-3, 215) |
Chris
Dapolito-Sr (6-3, 215) |
RB |
Cedric
Dargan-Jr (6-0, 200) |
Aaron
Fryer-So (5-11, 215) |
WR |
Deon
Adams-So (6-2, 190) |
.. |
WR |
Ronnie
Elliott-Jr (5-9, 185) |
Mark
Wigal-Jr (5-10, 185) |
WR |
Senterrio
Landrum-Sr (5-9, 185) |
Deonto
McCormick-So (5-10, 180) |
TE |
Andy
Roland-Jr (6-4, 235) |
Ben
Patrick-So (6-4, 260) |
OT |
Jim
Moravchik-Jr (6-6, 300) |
Chris
Best-Jr (6-5, 305) |
OG |
Chris
Best-Jr (6-5, 305) |
Paul
Campbell-So (6-3, 265) |
C |
Tyler
Kreig-So (6-5, 300) |
Dan
Mooney-Sr (6-5, 300) |
OG |
Lavdrim
Bauta-So (6-5, 290) |
Joel
East-So (6-4, 260) |
OT |
Christian
Mitchell-Sr (6-7, 325) |
Dan
Bowling-So (6-7, 230) |
K |
Matt
Brooks-Sr (6-1, 190) |
Alex
Feinberg-Fr (6-1, 200) |
|
|
2004
DEFENSE
|
Defensive
Line
The Blue Devils will field a physical, active
front line that will be well respected league-wide.
The unit is led by senior end Phillip Alexander,
who totaled 18.5 tackles for loss from his defensive
end position in 2003. He is a true threat who
must be accounted for on every play. Inside, sophomore
Orrin Thompson is a force, but has to finish more
often. He often demands double teams, though,
and can be disruptive in the ground game. He is
a prototypical interior anchor when playing at
his highest levels. Following a tragic car accident
that killed senior end Micah Harris, Duke is now
looking for a replacement opposite Alexander.
Undersized, but quick, sophomore Derek Bryant
fits that bill. This squad is likely to take a
step back, but another one going forward will
come by campaign's end as a unit is found.
Linebacker
Junior Brendan Dewan is one of the better linebackers
for Duke, which tells you much about this crew.
He is a fine athlete who can defend sideline to
sideline, but hasn't shown any superior abilities
his mates can count on regularly. He joints middle
linebacker Giuseppe Aguanno as a returning starter.
Aguanno is a capable run stopper who has the size
and strength to take on fullbacks and linebackers.
As a whole, Duke's linebackers are a sound bunch.
They won't garner national attention, but could
quietly be one of the most proficient unit's in
the south.
Defensive
Back
A trio of returning upperclassmen starters should
help to hinder their slipping trend. Corner Kenneth
Stanford will be the leader. His 12 pass breakups
show his ability to turn and see the play as it
comes at him, a special skill. The senior has
improved drastically and will team with John Talley,
who tied for the team lead in interceptions last
year as a freshman. The safety spots look to be
works in progress, though experience is there.
Green & Greene have not filled expectations
or their potentials, so watch them to see how
the rest of this defense fares.
DEFENSIVE
BREAKDOWN
The front seven is the strength here. While the
secondary has improved, it will remain vulnerable.
Look for Blue Devils to take full advantage of
their athleticism at linebacker, by blitzing often,
dropping the outside linebackers into coverage
and offering up varied looks for opposing offenses.
With Alexander and Thompson making plays up front,
opposing linemen will not be able to get runners
into those back echelons. But when they do, the
safeties will be strained to contain.
|
 |
CB
Kenneth Stanford
|
|
DUKE
2004 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters in bold
|
DEFENSE
|
DE |
Phillip
Alexander-Sr (6-4, 255) |
Justin
Kitchen-Jr (6-4, 235) |
DT |
Casey
Camero-So (6-5, 265) |
Demetrius
Warrick-Jr (6-7, 305) |
DT |
Orrin
Thompson-Sr (6-7, 320) |
Kevin
Wilson-So (6-2, 265) |
DE |
Eli
Nichols-So (6-5, 250) |
David
Martin-Jr (6-4, 240) |
OLB |
Malcolm
Ruff-Jr (6-1, 250) |
Alex
Williams-So (6-0, 210) |
MLB |
Giuseppe
Aguanno-Sr (6-1, 240) |
Codey
Lowe-So (6-2, 230) |
OLB |
Brendan
Dewan-Jr (6-2, 210) |
DeAndre
White-Jr (6-0, 210) |
CB |
Kenneth
Stanford-Sr (5-9, 180) |
Evalio
Harrell-Fr (5-9, 165) |
CB |
John
Talley-So (5-11, 175) |
Cedric
Mason-Fr (6-0, 185) |
S |
Brian
Greene-Jr (6-1, 190) |
C.J.
Woodard-Jr (6-0, 185) |
S |
Alex
Green-Sr (6-2, 195) |
Jeramy
Edwards-So (6-0, 205) |
P |
Trey
McDonald-Sr (6-2, 210) |
Matt
Brooks-Sr (6-1, 190) |
|
|
|
2004
SPECIAL TEAMS
|
Landrum
is all-Conference as a return man. He was among the
nation's best in kickoff returns and is a threat via
that venue. Trey McDonald is an adequate punter, but
the Duke coverage and net results were much worse, an
area that is sure to cost them with such little depth
on defense. Kicker is a bit of a question, but senior
Matt Brooks has proved to be accurate from inside 40
yards.
|
|
|
|
|