|
TB
Kevin Jones |
|
2002
Statistics
|
Coach:
Frank Beamer
117-69-2,
16 years |
2002
Record: 10-4
|
|
ARKANSAS
STATE |
WON
63-7 |
LOUISIANA
STATE |
WON
26-8 |
MARSHALL |
WON
47-21 |
at
Texas A&M |
WON
13-3 |
at
Western Michigan |
WON
30-0 |
at
Boston College |
WON
28-23 |
RUTGERS |
WON
35-14 |
TEMPLE |
WON
20-10 |
PITTSBURGH |
LOST
21-28 |
at
Syracuse |
LOST
42-50 (3OT) |
WEST
VIRGINIA |
LOST
18-21 |
VIRGINIA |
WON
21-9 |
at
Miami FL |
LOST
45-56 |
SAN
FRANCISCO BOWL
|
Air
Force |
WON
20-13 |
|
2002 Final Rankings
AP-18, Coaches-14, BCS-UR
|
2003
Outlook
|
Whereas
the 2002 season opened with muted expectations,
2003 will be quite the opposite. 2002's
team was full of inexperienced players -
uncertainty at quarterback, a new offensive
coordinator, and the most difficult schedule
Virginia Tech has played in recent memory.
There just wasn't enough depth at key positions
on defense when players went down after
their 8-0 start. This won't be the case
in 2003. Another schedule peppered with
too many cupcakes means that anything less
than a 10-win season will be a major disappointment.
The Hokies schedule looks lightly battered.
Certainly with teams like JMU, UConn, Rutgers
and Temple slated, Tech can ill-afford any
losses. If the Virginia Tech AD would try
to buy out JMU and get a quality opponent
in that position, things might look better
competition-wise. But he refuses, which
will deservedly make VT the subject of scorn
and debate. Still, with Texas A&M, Miami,
Pittsburgh, Boston College, and UVA on the
schedule, Tech will be appropriately and
accordingly measured. These all could be
Top 25 teams at the end of the year.
Frank
Beamer excels at winning games with great
special teams and great defense. The 2003-version
Hokies are similarly built to make a run
with that same formula. They are a likely
Top 10 team in every preseason poll, sneaking
up on people won't be an option. It has
been for quite a few years, a mark of respect
to constantly be in everyone's cross-hairs.
Senior leadership will get them over humps
2002's squad couldn't.
This
is the year to beat the rebuilding Hurricanes
- the Hokies will have to wait three more
years to see the Big East's perennial top
dog in such shape. VT has proven, even with
less talent, that they can run with the
Canes. With this game in Blacksburg, it
might not even be considered an upset if
they win. However, it's not clear whether
the Hokies can beat Pittsburgh, who matches
up well with their size - something VT has
traditionally had trouble with at talent
positions. They can go far with up to two
losses, it's just that none of them can
be to these two teams, or they go BCS-less
again.
Beamer-ball
makes for many restless nights in Blacksburg
high
expectations have (as recently as 2002)
led to major disappointments. But this year's
version will win when expected, and possibly
lose a few close, competitive, highlight-laden
tilts. Pride and confidence will be restored
in 2003.
Projected
2003 record: 11-1
|
|
|
OFFENSIVE
MVP
WR Ernest Wilford
QB Bryan Randall
|
DEFENSIVE
MVP
LB Mikal Baaqee
CB DeAngelo Hall
|
TOP
NEWCOMERS
QB Marcus Vick
DE Noland Burchette
|
|
|
|
VIRGINIA
TECH
*POWER RATINGS
|
Offense
|
Defense
|
QB
- 4 |
DL
- 5 |
RB
- 4.5 |
LB
- 4.5 |
WR
- 3 |
DB
- 4 |
OL
- 4 |
.. |
|
RETURNING
LEADERS
|
Passing:
Bryan Randall, 248-158-11, 2134 yds., 12
TD's
Rushing: Kevin Jones, 160 att., 871
yds., 9 TD's
Receiving: Ernest Wilford, 51 rec.,
925 yds., 7 TD's
Scoring: Carter Warley, 9-15 FG,
36-37 PAT, 63 pts.
Punting: Vinnie Burns, 64 punts,
40.5 avg.
Kicking: Carter Warley, 9-15 FG,
36-37 PAT, 63 pts.
Tackles: Mikal Baaqee, 112 tot.,
68 solo
Sacks: Nathaniel Adibi, 9 sacks;
Cols Colas, 9 sacks
Interceptions: Garnell Wilds, 5 for
8 yds.
Kickoff returns: Richard Johnson,
23 ret., 21.1 avg.
Punt returns: DeAngelo Hall, 22 ret.,
16.0 avg.
|
|
|
CB
DeAngelo Hall |
|
|
|
VIRGINIA
TECH |
|
|
OFFENSE
- 7
|
----RETURNING
STARTERS----
|
DEFENSE
- 9
|
|
KEY
LOSSES
|
OFFENSE:
Grant Noel-QB, Lee Suggs-TB, Shawn Witten-WR,
Terrell Parham-WR, Anthony Davis-OT, Luke
Owens-OG |
DEFENSE:
Ronyell
Whitaker-CB, Billy Hardee-ROV, Willie Pile-FS |
|
|
|
2003
OFFENSE
|
written
by TJ Murphy
The
big questions about Virginia Tech's offense next
year are 'Is Marcus (Vick) as good as Michael?',
'Will Marcus get the start over Bryan Randall?'
and 'How many yards will Kevin Jones get now that
he's the feature back?'
But
the more important question should be 'How good
is the offensive line?' While there is no shortage
of talent in the offensive 'skill' positions next
year, the Hokies must have a dominating power-rushing
attack to begin success. Never known for great
pass blocking, Hokie offensive linemen have typically
been able to put defensive players on their butts
during rushing plays. In 2002, this was not the
case for some of their most important games -
smart defenses crowded the box and forced the
Hokies to throw. The result was lowly rushing
attacks against teams like Texas A&M, LSU,
and Pittsburgh. Not only that, but they couldn't
push the ball in the end zone with 2nd-and-goal
in the close WVU loss. The line gave up 37 sacks
in 2002, despite having a mobile quarterback.
Could it be that Bryan Stinespring, who was promoted
to OC in addition to his OL coaching duties, was
too busy working out game plans to spend time
with his men in the trenches? Promoting an OL
coach to OC reflects Beamer's conservative offensive
mindset, but Stinespring did seem to open up the
playbook once defenses learned how to stop their
initial simplistic schemes.
The
good news about the offensive line is that the
young guys now have some experience. The Hokies
best lineman, Jake Grove, returns at center. The
Hokies have size and experience flanking Grove.
As a true freshman, Jimmy Martin replaced an ineffective
Jon Dunn at RT midway through 2002 and never lost
the spot. Martin is a little undersized at 6-5,
269. For the Hokies to be successful, they will
need to step up, particularly in pass protection
department. If one-dimensional, this offense is
easily stopped.
The
question remains, whom will they be protecting?
In his first year as starter, Bryan Randall proved
a more than able quarterback, with a strong arm
and clever elusiveness. He made mistakes typical
of a young quarterback - often running from the
pocket too soon, and throwing costly interceptions
(WVU game). However, he also was instrumental
in wins against LSU and Texas A&M, and he
exploded for over 500 yards passing and 5 TDs
in a loss to Syracuse. If he were the only returning
quarterback, the Hokies would be thrilled with
him as a returning starter
but then there's
Marcus Vick.
Perhaps
there is too much pressure on Marcus to perform
like his older brother. But Tech coaches have
said, "The acorn doesn't fall too far from
the tree". How does Frank Beamer not start
Vick, who chose Virginia Tech specifically knowing
Kevin Rogers was selected as QB coach? It's hard
to imagine Marcus is going to wait around two
years for his shot at starting. Beamer likes the
job to go to the incumbent, but spring practice
is going to generate a lot of attention (and it
won't be to see who's going to be starting at
tight end.) The smart money may be on Vick to
win the job, but we will keep you updated as soon
as this one plays out.
At
tailback, there are no question marks. Kevin Jones
is now the man. Phenomenally fast and strong,
this will be Jones' breakout year. He still has
some important things to learn, including holding
on to the football, and perhaps more importantly,
that sometimes three tough yards are more valuable
than trying a 50-yard bolt around the corner.
His best three linemen are in the middle and he
needs to run behind them more often rather than
to the outside. And if the OL learns how to pass
block reasonably well, look for Jones to catch
a lot of balls instead of staying home. Junior
TE Keith Willis is part of this equation, too
- he needs to develop into a quality blocker to
expand his range as a receiver. Taking that extra
LB away regularly, by route running or with helmet-to-helmet
application, will get Jones free in more ways
than one.
At
wide receiver, Ernest Wilford had a fantastic
year (by Hokie standards) with 8 TDs and a 18
yards-per-catch average (4 TDs, 279 yards vs.
Syracuse). He's a possession receiver (6'4")
with marginal speed. He won't go unnoticed by
2003 defenses, so it will be up to Richard Johnson,
or redshirt freshman Fred Lee to provide another
threat. Lee has the speed to stretch a defense,
but he's going to have to step up to see playing
time. If he does, the Hokies could actually pose
a major threat through the air. This element of
their game will be critical to teams that stuffed
the run last year by stacking the box with extra
men. SPRING UPDATE: Look for exceptional CB
DeAngelo Hall to make some noise at WR this fall.
His spring performance while running routes received
extremely positive reviews. It would not be surprising
to see this talented junior make waves as a legitimate
Heisman contender while playing both ways.
|
|
QB
Marcus Vick
|
VIRGINIA
TECH 2003 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters in bold
|
OFFENSE
|
QB |
Bryan
Randall-Jr (6-0, 222) |
Marcus
Vick-Fr (6-0, 203) |
FB |
Doug
Easlick-Sr (5-11, 238) |
.. |
TB |
Kevin
Jones-Jr (6-0, 209) |
Cedric
Humes-So (6-1, 223) |
WR |
Ernest
Wilford-Sr (6-4, 221) |
Chris
Shreve-Sr (6-0, 188) |
WR |
Richard
Johnson-Jr (5-10, 189) |
Justin
Hamilton-So (6-3, 209) |
TE |
Keith
Willis-Sr (6-5, 264) |
Jeff
King-So (6-5, 256) |
OT |
Jimmy
Martin-So (6-5, 283) |
Reggie
Butler-So (6-6, 333) |
OG |
Jacob
Gibson-Sr (6-4, 306) |
Will
Montgomery-So (6-4, 298) |
C |
Jake
Grove-Sr (6-3, 300) |
Robert
Ramsey-Jr (6-3, 307) |
OG |
James
Miller-Jr (6-6, 304) |
Jason
Murphy-So (6-2, 296) |
OT |
Jon
Dunn-Jr (6-7, 343) |
Brandon
Gore-Fr (6-5, 328) |
K |
Carter
Warley-Sr (5-11, 198) |
Nic
Schmitt-So (6-1, 242) |
|
|
2003
DEFENSE
|
written
by TJ Murphy
The
2002 defense had a Jeckyll-and-Hyde personality.
After giving up only 325 yards rushing in the
first eight games, they gave up over 1370 yards
in the next six games. The center of the defense
was torched. Much of this can be attributed to
key injuries, however Tech's DTs were undersized
and the LBs inexperienced. For 2003, these problems
should be corrected, though allowing 3.4 yards-per-carry
and ranking 29th in run defense isn't shabby.
The front-seven returns fully powered with reason
to bit-chomp.
Look
to senior inside linebacker Vegas Robinson to
(re)-assume the leadership role. He was leading
the team in tackles before injury made him miss
three games (not coincidentally, the beginning
of the losing streak.) Junior Mikal Baaquee, Tech's
leading tackler, will join Robinson in shoring
up inside backer position, but he is small and
not a hard hitter, so he will need the interior
DL to do their job for him to be effective.
Junior
Brandon Manning, who was third in tackles, will
bring experience to whip-LB. JUCO transfer Jimmy
E. Williams, a 6-3, 338 DT will provide the bulk
in the middle. At DE, the Hokies are loaded on
the two-deep depth chart with three-year starters.
Nathaniel Adibi and Cols Colas had terrific years
with nine sacks each, and, with Williams garnering
double-teams, should continue to harass QBs. Jim
Davis and likely Jason Lallis, who was too small
at DT, will get plenty of snaps in passing situations.
The
only key losses (3) are in the secondary. Pile's
hard-hitting leadership will be sorely missed,
while Whitaker's mental lapses and occasionally
costly penalties less so. Still, the Hokies look
to be in great shape. Junior DeAngelo Hall leads
this group at corner. A candidate for the Jim
Thorpe award last year, he had four interceptions
and returned them for a total of 124 yards. Eric
Green, who started as a true freshman in 2001,
took a medical redshirt last fall. He will challenge
to return to his starting position. Garnell Wilds
and Vincent Fuller saw plenty of action - Wilds
led the Hokies with five INTs while Fuller stole
four. At the Rover position, look for fiery JUCO
transfer James Griffin to battle for playing time
with Michael Crawford, who is recovering from
treatment of lymphoma. Griffin is a playmaker/
headhunter and could add the Corey Moore type
leadership that will personalize this defense.
These ball-hawkers, along with an acutely sharp
run-stopping crew, should improve on 2002's ranking
of 32nd in total defense.
|
|
DE
Nathaniel Adibi
|
VIRGINIA
TECH 2003 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters in bold
|
DEFENSE
|
DE |
Cols
Colas-Sr (6-0, 226) |
Noland
Burchette-Fr (6-2, 240) |
DT |
Jason
Lallis-Jr (6-0, 250) |
Jonathan
Lewis-So (6-1, 292) |
DT |
Kevin
Lewis-Jr (6-1, 292) |
Tim
Sandidge-So (6-1, 283) |
DE |
Nathaniel
Adibi-Sr (6-3, 255) |
Jim
Davis-Sr (6-3, 255) |
ILB |
Vegas
Robinson-Sr (6-0, 244) |
Blake
Warren-So (6-3, 232) |
ILB |
Mikal
Baaqee-Jr (5-10, 227) |
Chad
Cooper-Jr (6-2, 211) |
OLB |
Brandon
Manning-Jr (6-0, 216) |
James
Anderson-So (6-2, 217) |
CB |
DeAngelo
Hall-Jr (5-11, 198) |
Garnell
Wilds-Sr (5-11, 196) |
CB |
Vincent
Fuller-Jr (6-1, 181) |
Eric
Green-Jr (5-11, 190) |
ROV |
Michael
Crawford-Sr (5-11, 209) |
James
Griffin-Jr (6-1, 193) |
FS |
Jimmy
F. Williams-So (6-3, 213) |
Mike
Daniels-Jr (6-0, 205) |
P |
Vinnie
Burns-Jr (5-11, 202) |
Nic
Schmitt-So (6-1, 242) |
|
|
|
2003
SPECIAL TEAMS
|
Virginia
Tech's kick-blocking legacy is renowned nationally.
If anyone was ever to find a way to block kickoffs,
it would be Beamer. They will continue to strike fear
in punters and place kickers, guaranteed. On punt returns,
DeAngelo Hall had a stellar year, averaging 16 yards
per kick and returning two for touchdowns. Only a junior,
he's quick enough to get many more scores before the
next level. Richard Johnson will be back returning kickoffs,
but might get pushed in spring training by Fred Lee.
Vinnie Burns was solid all year punting and was a semifinalist
for the Ray Guy award. But coverage and net punting
was a very un-Beamer-like 62nd in all I-A.
The
special teams area that is of most concern, though,
is place-kicking. Carter Warley was doing well until
he had back problems. He came back against Syracuse,
but missed two field goals. He will get competition
from sophomore Nic Schmitt (0-for-3 from 40+), but Warley
(3-for-6, 40+) will likely get the start. There will
be at least one or two games where the Hokies are going
to need the PK to win. This could be a problem, an ironic
one especially for the best kick-blockers to have, huh.
|
|
Frank Beamer says there is competition at
every spot on this team, which has been
making everyone work harder. The player
benefiting most from competition is QB Bryan
Randall. Randall had a nearly flawless spring,
with Marcus Vick right on his heels. Expect
to see Vick in there at times to please
both him and the fans, but the real money
is on Randall
The Hokies will have
some good depth at RB behind Jones, as Cedric
Humes and Mike Iwoh have proved worthy
To supplement the receiver position, the
Hokies will utilize CB DeAngelo Hall for
about 20 plays on offense this year. WRs
Chris Clifton and Chris Shreve have been
showing improvement, as have Robert Parker
and Fred Lee. Shreve is one of the fastest
players on the team and gives the Hokies
a possession guy, who can jet when he gets
in the open. Clifton gives them a big (6'4"),
physical receiver that will give defenses
a fit, especially in the red zone.
Defensive depth is abundant, especially
on the DL and in the secondary
The
DL took a bit of a hit this spring when
Jimmy Williams was suspended indefinitely.
Helping to fill the void will be DT Isaac
Montgomery, a transfer from North Carolina.
He is one of the strongest players of the
group and will add to VTs already plentiful
depth
The secondary will be aided by
the return of CB Eric Green, who started
23 of his first 24 games at VA Tech, but
sat out last year with a knee injury
Freshman Cory Gordon will push Williams
and Daniels at the FS position. The same
can be said about D.J. Walton as he duels
James Griffin for the backup ROV spot
Bud Foster has been broadcasting the talents
of WHIP Aaron Rouse, who has shown great
movement all over the field
If nobody
puts a stronghold on the ILB spot, we may
see stud FROSH Xavier Adibi get an early
start on his sure-to-be stellar Hokie career.
There
are three players competing at PK- Carter
Warley, Nic Schmitt, and Brandon Pace. None
of the three were dazzling in the spring,
struggling with accuracy and consistency.
The return of Eric Green helps the kick
blocking units. He has blocked three in
two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|