|
DT
Corey Williams |
|
2002
Statistics
|
Coach:
Steve Roberts
6-7,
1 year |
2002
Record: 6-7
|
|
at
Virginia Tech |
LOST
7-63 |
SAN
JOSE STATE |
LOST
14-33 |
TULSA |
WON
21-19 |
at
Illinois |
LOST
7-59 |
at
Louis.-Monroe |
WON
33-21 |
TENNESSEE-MARTIN |
WON
30-10 |
MIDDLE
TENNESSEE |
WON
13-7 |
at
Mississippi |
LOST
17-52 |
NORTH
TEXAS |
LOST
10-13 |
NEW
MEXICO STATE |
LOST
21-26 |
SOUTHERN
UTAH |
WON
38-16 |
at
Louis.-Lafayette |
LOST
10-13 |
at
Idaho |
WON
38-29 |
|
2002 Final Rankings
AP-UR, Coaches-UR, BCS-UR
|
2003
Outlook
|
The
needed trends in Jonesboro should be obvious
- offensively, the QB has to compliment
the rest of the well-seasoned positions.
Getting the balls to proven receivers is
a priority, as is establishing the successor
to Danny Smith. The OL has to play at 2002's
stellar level to give this team any edge
in advancing these fundamentals. Defensively,
too, the line has to be an anchor of sorts.
This side of the ball has less potential
pitfalls (the secondary has the most question
marks), so it can be a banked on as a building
block for Little Rock-native HC Steve Roberts.
Nine starters return for the Indian D, a
number easily factoring into any subsequent
success.
Roberts
got State more conference wins - six - in
his first year (2002) than they had earned
in any one of the last eleven seasons since
joining I-A. He took them from just 2-9
the previous year to 6-7 and within 15 points
of the Sun Belt crown. Stability is evident
when you inspect to whom they won and lost
- better teams beat them while they buried
any underdogs. But look out for that sophomore
slump, Stevie boy. Expectations will be
high, meaning disappointment is right around
the proverbial corner. A similarly consistent
performance is needed, otherwise, beating
a few schools to whom they're underdogs
won't outweigh losing to a few they should
have beat. Questions and judgments then
begin, and it's only a matter of time unless
extreme success steps in.
Likely
losses at Texas A&M and Mississippi
need to be offset by strong showings and/or
wins at New Mexico State (NMSU leads series
6-1), at Utah State, at North Texas, and
at home versus S.E. Missouri St. These Sun
Belt foes will be the measuring stick in
which to evaluate all the above listed criteria.
Middle Tenn. St. is another big game, but
defensively, they should make this one simple.
But with this 2003 defense set to lose many
of its component players/parts for 2004,
the iron is hot and striking time is now.
A bowl game is a realistic ending for these
hungry Indians. Winning the SBC title is
a longer shot, but not out of reach.
Projected
2003 record: 6-6
|
|
|
LB
Les Echols |
|
OFFENSIVE
MVP
QB Elliott Jacobs
|
DEFENSIVE
MVP
LB Reggie Everett
|
TOP
NEWCOMER
RB Shermar Bracey
|
|
|
|
ARKANSAS
STATE
*POWER RATINGS
|
Offense
|
Defense
|
QB
- 2.5 |
DL
- 3.5 |
RB
- 2 |
LB
- 3.5 |
WR
- 3 |
DB
- 2.5 |
OL
- 2.5 |
.. |
|
RETURNING
LEADERS
|
Passing:
Elliot Jacobs, 258-136-7, 1751 yds., 7 TD
Rushing: Antonio Warren, 134 att.,
554 yds., 3 TD
Receiving: Jason Wood, 22 rec., 185
yds., 1 TD
Scoring: Eric Neihouse, 10-22 FG,
31-32 PAT, 61 pts.
Punting: none
Kicking: Eric Neihouse, 10-22 FG,
31-32 PAT, 61 pts.
Tackles: Les Echols, 107 tot., 46
solo
Sacks: Corey Williams, 9 sacks
Interceptions: Jonathan Burke, 5
for 59 yds.
Kickoff returns: Jerome Stegall,
14 ret., 19.4 avg.
Punt returns: Lamar Lee, 3 ret.,
7.0 avg.
|
|
|
|
|
OFFENSE
- 5
|
----RETURNING
STARTERS----
|
DEFENSE
- 9
|
|
KEY
LOSSES
|
OFFENSE:
Garry Johnson-OT, Jesse Duncan-OG, John Crossley-OG,
Shane Tolleson-FB, Danny Smith-RB, James Hickenbotham-WR |
DEFENSE:
Jon
Bradley-DT, Chuck Allen-CB, Maurice Joyner-WS,
Mike Alexander-P |
|
|
2003
OFFENSE
|
written
by Dave Hershorin
The
offense will pick up this campaign. 2002 was evidently
an adjustment period for new HC Steve Roberts
and his young staff. The limited dimensions of
still-starting QB Elliot Jacobs hampered the offensive
production. An option-type QB in prep, his drop-back
abilities needed a year's seasoning. Stats like
4th quarter scoring (ASU was outscored 90-58)
and 3rd-down conversion rate (33%) reflect such
immaturity. But his foot skills are still there,
so expect much more from Jacobs. He has competition
in red-shirted freshman Reid McKinney and junior
Bryan Gauthreaux. Gauthreaux is listed as second-string
due to limited 2001 playing time. But McKinney's
superior arm and comfort in the pocket make his
eventual real-game showing something both will
have to anticipate and accept. This bodes well
for State, which could utilize all in effective
sequences, regardless. If this is pulled off,
only the best defenses will be able to stop a
changed up presentation, so a sneaky rotation
could work here. If Jacobs can hit his targets
early and often, he should have the job until
his accuracy falters. His decision-making has
to be keen, or else we see Gauthreaux or McKinney
injected for those reasons, too.
Running
back is an area that needs development, but should
be viable, anyway. Now-departed Danny Smith set
the school's single-season rushing mark in 2002.
Antonio Warren is the likely replacement. From
2002's performances alone, he wins the spot. His
two cracked ribs weren't enough to keep him from
still backing up Smith. Toughness is an intangible
coaches love. But that, along with one 193-yard
game (9/7/02 vs. Tulsa), isn't enough to cement
him the spot. Look out for juco-transfer Shermar
Bracey. His durability is in question (only one
year each of high school and juco football), but
his combo of size and speed (6'3", 225, 4.38
sec in the 40) isn't. Expectations are being kept
low until he proves his I-A worth. Clinton Roy
is a bruising wildcard who could definitely help
at either back position.
FB
is another story. The position looks to be juco-transfer
Ramon Williams' to lose. Walk-on Oren O'Neal is
undersized, but can amply plow just the same.
Look for the backfield to be underestimated by
most opponents to allow for early success, which
will critically need to be continued into the
season's second half if the Indians are to go
anywhere.
The
strongest part of ASU's 2002 offensive squad was
their hole-opening, QB-protecting line. Allowing
seven sacks and forging a 4.4 yds per carry average
qualifies them as a special unit on that struggling
offense (19.9 points per tilt was 99th in all
I-A). They lose two four-year starters, but the
hungry replacements have extensive starting and/or
real-game minutes logged. The Indians will reshuffle
many of the positions and who plays at each as
the fall approaches, but bank on another strong
performance from these Jonesboro hogs. If Jacobs
stays in, look for their sacks-allowed number
to remain single-digits.
Wide
receivers abound at State, but finding the starters
seems to be the biggest problem for this deep
roster of snarlers. It really isn't any evaluation
of these players that reflects the passing game's
larger concern - its QB. All of these guys can
catch and run once they have the ball. Mike Cox
can stretch defenses, making him an assured start.
Chuck Walker also proved enough in spring to get
the nod. Jerome Stegall also has eventual starting
potential, and will supplement the return game,
too. Regardless, the WRs have the talent that
cuts a QB's work out for him well. If this dimension
remains underutilized, it will spell demise for
this offense. Any lack of balance will be sniffed
out and exploited, accordingly.
|
|
WR
Mike Cox
|
ARKANSAS
STATE 2003 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters in bold
|
OFFENSE
|
QB |
Elliot
Jacobs-Jr |
Bryan
Gauthreaux-Jr |
RB |
Antonio
Warren-Jr |
Clinton
Roy-So / Oren O'Neal-So (FB) |
WR |
Jason
Wood-Jr |
Gary
Vincent-Fr |
WR |
Chuck
Walker-Jr |
Jerome
Stegall-Jr |
WR |
Mike
Cox-Sr |
Jason
Boyd-So |
TE |
Mike
Brooks-Jr |
Manuel
Burton-So |
OT |
Matt
Roth-Jr |
Darrian
Billups-Fr |
OG |
Steven
Gibbs-Jr |
Anthony
Mitchell-Sr |
C |
Tab
Slaughter-Jr |
Tanner
Jenkins-Fr |
OG |
Brandon
Crocker-Jr |
Bo
Mitchell-So |
OT |
Kimani
Jones-Sr |
Frank
Arritt-Sr |
K |
Eric
Neihouse-So |
.. |
|
|
2003
DEFENSE
|
written
by Dave Hershorin
Employing
a 4-2-5 means the line has multiple duties. With
only two, opponents often pull LBs into decoy
coverage, meaning one or more ASU linemen has/have
to react (and often cover) differently than most
in case it's a pass. This produces quick-responding,
discerning giants that garner national recognition.
Seniors Corey Williams and John Bradley make for
a pair of middle cloggers that produce as well
as distract. Either can handle a double-team well
enough to then make the play. Bradley is a ball-hawk,
forcing five fumbles in '02, while Williams chalked
up 13 QB-hurries. Which one to double-team
hmmm?
And both sacks and pass-breakups are part of this
duo's profile, too. Memphis-bred sophomore Courtney
Todd and fellow DE Zach Grigsbey show little or
no sign that their undersized physical qualities
keep them from achieving. And freshman Myron Anderson,
along with Bryant Berry, give depth and precision
play to form possibly the best overall non-major
conference DL in the country. Returning all starters
and essential second-teamers easily allows for
this. Look for the 4.1 yards per rush they allowed
to significantly decrease as their sack total
of 33 goes the other way. They need to keep points
off the board, though, seeing as 21 rushing TDs
allowed isn't poor, but could easily improve with
the potential of this bunch.
Les
Echols and Steven Tookes return for the Indians
to ground the LB position well from a starters
standpoint. The teams first and third leading
tacklers, respectively, should make even more
of an impact - this will be their second year
of being the only glue in the middle. True-sophomore
Jermaine Montgomery will push for playing time
after destroying everything he saw on special
teams. Others will give depth to this unit and
make run-stopping a must if anything is to change.
The
secondary is another story. There is major talent
in returning Texarkana-born Alex Peoples and junior
Jonathan Burke. Peoples' nose for the ball allowed
him to be second in tackles, while Burke is a
sizeable corner who can cover man-to-man exceptionally
well. Senior corner Lamar Lee lends experience,
speed, and innate radar to this ungelled grouping
of talent. Chris Littleton is young, but his trial-by-fire
initiation from 2002 worked well as Littleton
excelled. Juco-transfer Lamar Adams was an All-American
before ASU got him, so expect Adams to amply contribute
to the safety position's development. 2002 saw
the Indian's best-ever finish in the I-A pass
protection rankings, 16th. This unit will be hard
pressed to repeat such a feat. Look for the front
six to change enough game dimensions to make this
area seem strong through their numbers produced.
But, if the run-stoppers struggle, the secondary
will show its shortfalls (as a group or otherwise).
|
|
CB
Jonathan Burke
|
ARKANSAS
STATE 2003 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters in bold
|
DEFENSE
|
DE |
Zach
Grigsby-Sr |
Anthony
Camp-So |
DT |
Jon
Bradley-Sr |
Myron
Anderson-So |
NT |
Corey
Williams-Sr |
Bryant
Berry-Sr |
DE |
Courtney
Todd-Jr |
David
Vargas-Sr |
LB |
Steven
Tookes-Jr |
Reggie
Everett-Jr |
LB |
Les
Echols-Sr |
Eddie
Walker-Jr |
CB |
Lamar
Lee-Sr |
Joe
Williams-Sr |
CB |
Jonathan
Burke-Sr |
Kelvin
Cox-Fr |
WS |
LeKeith
Grace-Sr |
LeUndo
Adams-Jr |
SS |
Chris
Littleton-So |
Josh
Ward-Fr |
FS |
Alex
Peoples-Jr |
Casey
Venters-Sr |
P |
Eric
Neihouse-So |
.. |
|
|
|
2003
SPECIAL TEAMS
|
There
is a problem in 2002's punting numbers that ASU has
to fix. They didn't allowed many return yards, but they
didn't punt it too far, either. Old punter - gone; new
punter - same guy who placekicks, Eric Neihouse. He
should get some walk-on competition, but for now, Neihouse
is the only punter on campus. Coverage is the variable
obviously in focus. Same goes for kickoffs - they cover
well, yet few touchbacks, so look for keen coverage
to compensate. Stegall and Walker will return KOs as
well as their blocking allows, while Lee will have punts
in hand. Field goals are their own problem with Neihouse.
He went 10-for-22 (0-for-6 from 40+, four FGAs blocked)
but showed signs in spring ball of putting his awful
freshman season well behind him. Grounded special teams
can lift a .500 club to a few more wins, so ASU has
even more work cut out here to both assure any marginal
success and simultaneously avoid giving away any games.
|
|
|
|
|